11 Comments

  1. That is not the reasoning they use and they have never said anything like that.

    Sharks are not added because adding hostile mobs that represent real animals would supposedly encourage people to hate them irl and potentially try to harm the real animals. Far fetched, but not the reason you stated.

    I honestly don’t even get the obsession with sharks, minecraft is a fantasy world that has plenty of made up creatures, what would be so wrong with a fictional sea monster?

    And my best guess on the sulfur pools is that some sulfur pools irl are actually safe because the PH levels and temperature of the water aren’t always too extreme for us.
    It would however be nice if the cases where those pools **are** genuinely dangerous were also represented in game.

    Sadly I doubt that will happen, because you can breathe in magma block bubble columns, which are supposed to be underwater volcanic vents. So mojang seems to care more about babying the player than making anything accurate *or* decently challenging.

  2. Ghostsharklegs99 on

    I think Mojang’s reasoning is probably the opposite. Introducing sharks as an environmental hazard would reinforce the narrative that sharks are dangerous, and potentially threaten them further irl. I think adding sharks only make sense is you can make them interesting without them seeming monstrous, and idk if you can strike that balance.

  3. “Making up stuff on the internet has never been so easy with these 3 simple tricks!”

  4. Mojang said they aren’t adding sharks because they don’t want to encourage the killing of sharks/the idea that sharks are man-eaters, while also not wanting them to be too passive to where kids won’t keep their distance

    What are you on

  5. KittyQueen_Tengu on

    this logic doesn’t make sense, we already have lava and actual bombs in the game

  6. When will we stop with the shark or “fireflies are poisonous to frog” discourses? It’s been 4 years already and it’s getting tiresome